Is true-shape nesting always shorter?
No. Savings depend on the artwork geometry, quantities and production settings.
THE PROBLEM IS THE BOX
Two layouts can contain exactly the same artwork and quantities while using different amounts of film. The difference is what the nesting engine believes each design occupies.
Fill My Film creates the gang sheet file for your own printer or RIP workflow. It does not print or ship DTF transfers.


THE SHORT ANSWER
Box packing reserves the full rectangular canvas around each design. True-shape nesting uses the printable silhouette, allowing compatible transparent corners and cutouts to share space while maintaining the selected gap.
BASIC
Rectangular packing sees width and height. It does not care whether the visible design is a circle, arch or narrow diagonal mark inside that canvas.
This approach remains useful as a fast baseline and for artwork that nearly fills its rectangle.
MAX
A one-bit mask identifies the printable silhouette without transmitting the source artwork pixels. The nesting service uses that geometry, dimensions and spacing rules to search for closer placements.
Irregular and mixed artwork tends to create more opportunities than a batch of identical rectangles.
MEASURED EXAMPLE
The Basic export measured 22 × 31.5 inches. The MAX export measured 22 × 25.13 inches. Both contained the same 15 prints with the same roll width, margins and gap.
That is 6.4 inches less film on this specific job. It is evidence for this artwork mix, not a promise that every job saves the same percentage.
QUESTIONS PRINTERS ASK
No. Savings depend on the artwork geometry, quantities and production settings.
No. It changes placement. The design's physical size and printable pixels remain the same.
Yes. MAX includes the selected spacing in its placement calculations.
MORE PRINTS · LESS FILM
Start free. No card. Your artwork stays in your browser.